As I wrote in the ST84Photo on Sunday, Britain’s photography scene finally seems to be catching up with the US.
It is currently in the stage of “shouting as loudly as possible about minor advancements in London, while generally ignoring anything that happens outside of London or, just as importantly, anything that happens online”. It is a stage the US entered (re New York, mutatis mutandis**) roughly 30 years ago. What progress we’ve made.
That ST84Photo article was in response to one posted by Sean O’Hagan on the Observer/Guardian website. Today, he’s added a new post all about the immensely crucial topic of two London galleries (including the largest photo gallery in the UK) having to slightly scale back the size of their (expanded) galleries and exhibitions.
I don’t want to sound like I’ve been drinking some Observer/Guardian Haterade here, but isn’t this kind of photography discussion, well, excruciatingly dull? I mean, when there are projects like this, this, and this happening?
Or when there are other cool things to talk about, like Troika Editions opting to use their popular website to promote the work they find during portfolio reviews but don’t necessarily have resources to feature onsite?
Just as some examples. I’m sure there are more and better examples. I’m being lazy here. Because it’s so damn easy to be lazy and still come up with content more interesting than the couple of cubic inches the largest UK photo gallery has lost, and the horrific ramifications of precisely how fewer interns they’ll be able to fit into the new space as a result.
If the most interesting things happening in the UK photography scene at the moment consist of the Tate awarding photography the qualification of “art form” by hiring a photography curator (please note: this qualification has yet to be ratified formally by UCAS), and The Photographers’ Gallery losing a small amount of space, I think it’s high time that we just give up on the whole photographic enterprise altogether.
*Please note: This image is not of ST84Photo Museum.
**If you aren’t acquainted with the term, mutatis mutandis, please become so! It makes me think of the Lion King…
ST84Photo Disclaimer: Despite all this ranting, you can fully expect me to reporting both in depth and probably in celebration on the opening of Open Eye Gallery this week.
As my last post attests, I’m a big fan of initiative and achieving great ideas, even when resources are limited.
Third Floor Gallery is one such Great Idea. Since February 2010, they’ve been producing some brilliant photography exhibitions showcasing a range of talent. And they’ve done it without ACE (arts council – UK government) funding.
Last spring, Joni Karanka from the gallery came up to Open Eye Gallery to talk about Third Floor’s work. Open Eye started out, just like Third Floor, as a grassroots organisation founded by dedicated photography fans who just want to share great work. That was in the 1970s. Open Eye are due this week to re-open in a new space on Liverpool’s Waterfront, and is considered a key photography gallery internationally, as well as a key cultural body within Liverpool. Joni is now cutting his hair in a bid to raise money to keep Third Floor Gallery open and brilliant.
So, I’m supporting Third Floor Gallery, by offering to also cut off 5 (or more) inches of my curly girly hair to raise money to cover running costs for the Gallery. And I’m asking anyone who has appreciated ST84Photo Blog to consider donating to this cause.
Here’s the relevant link, and it only takes you a moment to donate!
All money raised goes direct to Third Floor Gallery.
When it comes to ACE funded organisations, we asked the government to stop the cuts. Third Floor aren’t ACE funded at all so, for them, we’re asking you to give some money to start the cuts (hair only) and keep them going!
ST84Photo Blog is taking a momentary step away from photo talk to bring you this…
The University applications organisation, UCAS, is urging that students should apply to university after they receive their grades.
One of the major reasons cited by advocates of this change in the televised/radio discussions of it is that students apply to the courses they think they might get into, instead of having the ambition to apply for the course they most want to do. In support of this, they also say that schools will discourage students from applying to courses they think they might not be successful in getting a place at.
Now, I have a problem with this line of logic. Partly, no doubt, because I was one of those students once. I’m from a “povvo” background and wanted to apply to Oxford University. My school didn’t think I’d get in, because of my background. I disagreed. I applied. I got my acceptance letter pretty swiftly.
While there are a range of issues with the current university applications system (not to mention with the current education system generally…), I’m concerned that we have advocates for UK youths who are essentially saying, rather than support young people to have sufficient self-esteem, ambition, and belief in their power to achieve their own goals and to change the society they live in by doing so, we need to change the current applications system, because without pieces of paper from us proving their worth they wont believe their own worth.
I have bits of paper from people like this. They have no real value to me when they’ve been awarded by individuals and organisations with such rank professional narcissism. The qualifications have nothing more than utility to me. I knew I was capable long before I ever received them. And it is that capability that has value, both to me and to society.
In a failing economy, and a world where technological advances mean that entrepreneurs will innovate to bring new products to market, and new jobs are being created requiring skills we don’t have qualifications for yet, surely fostering an attitude among the young that qualifications are the only arbiter for moving ahead with an idea is a dangerous path to take?
It is important to train, and it is important to listen to feedback. But it is also important to learn how to keep developing your own ideas and plans in the face of negative feedback, when you’re convinced that you have the capability to achieve something. That’s where progress and innovation comes from.
Or, as George Bernard Shaw once said, “The people who get on in this world are the people who get up and look for the circumstances they want, and, if they can’t find them, make them.” What piece of paper does UCAS have for grading that?
This is part of an interview series with members of Seconds2Real street photography collective, in celebration of their recent exhibition in Berlin in October.A video of this exhibition can be viewed at the bottom of this post.
What brought you to doing street photography? How long have you been a street photographer? Why do you love it?
Before I started with Street photography I took ordinary pictures, like everyone else. 2002 I saw an exhibition in Tokyo by Andre Kertesz and was impressed by his pictures. This was the moment when I realized, that I would like to work as a street photographer. I am not working professional as a street photographer; it’s a hobby or more like a passion.
Which photographers inspire you?
Andre Kertesz, Henri-Cartier Bresson, Ray K. Metzker, Ernst Haas. The most influence on my work is given to me by Andre Kertesz. I like his style how he had seen the scene and as well his creative thinking. I am as well an admirer of Ernst Haas, he has some wonderful pictures that I admire.
Editing/selecting which images to show is crucial for a street photographer. Has being in a collective helped you with this process?
Yes, sometimes is it very good to have this collective. So different eyes look at the work. But most of the time you have to consider by yourself which photos your will publish in the internet, exhibitions or books.
In the UK, street photography has become very popular over the last year (the Street Photography Now book published, Format Festival dedicated to street photography, the London Street Photography Festival, your work on show at Look11, and lots of popular workshops).
Have you felt that street photography has also been more popular recently in your own country? And do think that street photography will continue to be popular in this way?
Yes, I have recognized that Street Photography becomes more and more popular even in Germany. But the main towns for Street Photography are still London and New York.
Any tips or “words of wisdom” for other street photographers?
In my opinion he has to be curiously, open minded and has to capture the situation in a quick moment. A street photographer should learn to use the “2nd layer”. This means the game between foreground and background, otherwise the pictures does not look so interesting. And it is very important to train his perceptual memory, always checking the environment.
What would be your ideal gear for doing street photography with?
A noiseless small camera with a quick autofocus, which makes good and quality photos.
Seconds2Real made this video of their recent exhibition in Berlin.
For some reason, for me, good doesn’t cut it. I yearn for great. I’m trying to figure out what this means to me. Part of it is about having a very strong sense of what you’re doing. Whether that’s sophisticated or emotional (articulate or visceral), that integrity has to be there totally, or I’m not interested. So much work I look at and think the composition is good, or the colours are nice, or something like that, but no more. The people I really rate – Parke, Norfolk, Graham, and so on – they all have this intense sense of intent.
As you can see from the seminar programme I’ve added below, there are some great speakers lined up. I’ve also pre-blogged this entry, so it’s probably also grim and raining, and not sunny at all. Which makes the (presumably) scintillating debate a welcome distraction from my shivering. Or something like that.
Depending on how it is going, I might currently be taking some notes on what is being discussed to post up here when I return to Liverpool.
11.00 – 11.15
Introduction by Brigitte Lardinois, Deputy Director photography and the Archive Research Centre, University of the Arts London
11.15 – 12.15
Donovan Wylie, Photographer
Introduction to show + In Conversation with Greg Hobson, Curator of Photographs
12.15 – 13.15
Lunch and opportunity for delegates to see show
13.15 – 13.45
Hilary Roberts, Head Curator Photograph Archive Imperial War Museum
Cecil Beaton’s use of structure and form in his work as a Ministry of Information official photographer during the Second World War.
13.45 – 14.15
Melanie Friend, Photographer
Melanie will be talking about her new project, The Home Front, which focuses on the marketing of war and the relationship between militarism and leisure.
14.15 – 14.45
Paul Lowe, Course Director, MA Photojournalism and Documentary Photography, London College of Communication
Paul will discuss how his work as a photographer in Bosnia and Palestine has explored the spatial and geographic aspects of conflict zones that much news photography ignores.
14.45 – 15.00
15.00 – 15.30
Richard Daniels, Senior Archivist/Assistant Manager, University of the Arts London Archives and Special Collections Centre
Using material from the Stanley Kubrick Archive Richard will explore how Kubrick created Vietnam in an abandoned industrial estate in East London.
15.30 – 16.00
Jennifer Pollard, Senior Lecturer, History & Theory of Photojournalism & Documentary Photography, London College of Communication
The fallen ‘twin towers’ as central symbols within the photojournalistic convention of substituting bodies with buildings (or ‘cityscapes of flesh’) in the reportage of urban catastrophe.
16.00 – 16.30
Stephen Graham, Professor of Cities and Society, Newcastle University
Cities Under Siege: The New Military Urbanism Cities have become the new battleground of our increasingly urban world. From the slums of the global South to the wealthy financial centers of the West, this talk will trace how political violence now operates through the sites, spaces, infrastructures and symbols of the world’s rapidly expanding metropolitan areas.
16.30 – 17.00